Hossen v Hughes [2014] ACTSC 101 (21 May 2014) - SCA 84 of 2013 - Penfold J – Supreme Court of the ACT - Appeal from Magistrates Court - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – Appeal against sentence imposed in Magistrates Court for assault on wife
↧
Hossen v Hughes
↧
Moon v Whitehead
Moon v Whitehead - [2014] ACTCA 16 - ACTCA 1 of 2014 - SCC 1044 of 2008 - Penfold J – Supreme Court of the ACT - PROCEDURE – Costs – application by allegedly impecunious respondent to appeal for security for costs – appellant had transferred property in his residence
↧
↧
Wagdy Hanna and Associates Pty Limited v Gavagna
Wagdy Hanna and Associates Pty Limited v Gavagna [2014] ACTSC 97 (21 May 2014) Master Harper - Supreme Court of the ACT - SC 284 of 2007 - CONTRACT – claim by architect for fees for professional services – written agreement with architect signed by employed solicitor – architect claiming
↧
Eastman v Australian Capital Territory
Eastman v Australian Capital Territory - [2014] ACTSC 105 - SC 410 of 2013 - 22 May 2014 - Murrell CJ – Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory - ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – “decision” – meaning of – whether a refusal to exercise a discretion to grant release on
↧
Director of Public Prosecutions for the ACT v The Honourable Acting Justice Martin
Director of Public Prosecutions for the Australian Capital Territory v The Honourable Acting Justice Brian Martin [2014] ACTSC 104 (22 May 2014) Judges: Murrell CJ, Katzmann & Wigney JJ - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SC 436 of 2013 - CRIMINAL LAW – inquiry after conviction – decision
↧
↧
Walters & Ors t/as Elringtons v Kemp
DAVID ANTHONY WARD WALTERS & ORS T/AS ELRINGTONS v GRAHAM RONALD KEMP [2014] ACTSC 100 (23 May 2014) Judge: Burns J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SC 228 of 2011 - PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for strike out – application to strike out Reply to
↧
HA v Vince
HA v Vince - [2014] ACTSC 106 - 26 May 2014 - Penfold J – Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory - Appeal from Magistrates Court (criminal) - Catchwords: APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – In General and Right of Appeal – appeal from
↧
Hillman v Box as Executors of the Estate of Graeme William Box (No 4)
NOELLE ELIZABETH HILLMAN v LYNDA BOX, DEBRAH BOX AND SKYE BOX AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF GRAEME WILLIAM BOX (NO 4) [2014] ACTSC 107 (28 May 2014) Judge: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SC 564 of 2010 - CONVEYANCING – LAND TITLES UNDER
↧
R v Catanzariti
R v CATANZARITI - [2014] ACTSC 109 - SCC 208 of 2012 - 29 May 2014 - Penfold J –Supreme Court of the ACT - CRIMINAL LAW – JURISDICTION, PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Pleas – pleas of guilty to four sexual offences – disputed facts hearing listed – application for
↧
↧
R v Ang
THE QUEEN v ANG [2014] ACTCA 17 (30 May 2014 - Refshauge, Penfold and Ross JJ – Supreme Court of the ACT - Appeal from Supreme Court (criminal) - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – APPEAL – GENERAL PRINCIPLES – Interference with Discretion of Court Below – Crown appeal against making
↧
Blunden v Commonwealth Of Australia
BARRY THOMAS BLUNDEN v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA [2014] ACTSC 123 (2 June 2014) Judge: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SC 324 of 1998 - LIMITATION OF ACTIONS – General – Torts – Personal injury – Application to re-instate proceedings – When cause of action arises
↧
O’Connell v McMennemin
MICHAEL O’CONNELL v DAVID MCMENNEMIN [2014] ACTSC 112 (4 June 2014) ON APPEAL FROM THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY - Judge: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SCA 82 of 2013 - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – In General and Right of Appeal
↧
Roseby v Harman
SAMUEL DUNCAN ROSEBY v SARAH HARMAN [2014] ACTSC 125 (5 June 2014) ON APPEAL FROM THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY - Judge: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SCA 104 of 2013 - APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – In general and right
↧
↧
Islam v Wasley and Ross
MIZANUL RAHMAN ISLAM v PAUL HOWARD WASLEY AND DYLAN ROSS [2014] ACTSC 127 (5 June 2014) ON APPEAL FROM THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY - Judges: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the Australian Capital Territory - SCA 40 of 2014 - APPEAL-GENERAL PRINCIPLES – in general
↧
Byrne v Mingay
ERIN BYRNE v GARY WILLIAM MINGAY [2014] ACTSC 126 (5 June 2014) ON APPEAL FROM THE MAGISTRATES COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY - Judge: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SCA 105 of 2013 - APPEAL-GENERAL PRINCIPLES – In general and right of appeal –
↧
Wiser v Havelock Housing Association Inc
FREEMAN WISER v HAVELOCK HOUSING ASSOCIATION INC [2014] ACTSC 138 (6 June 2014) ON APPEAL FROM THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL - HUMAN RIGHTS ACT - Judge: Burns J - Supreme Court of the ACT - SCA 107 of 2013 - LEASES AND TENANCIES – Occupancy
↧
Financial Integrity Group Pty Limited v Farmer and Bravium Pty Limited (NO 4)
FINANCIAL INTEGRITY GROUP PTY LIMITED v SCOTT FARMER AND BRAVIUM PTY LIMITED (NO 4) [2014] ACTSC 145 (16 June 2014) EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT - Judge: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SC 589 of 2007 - PROCEDURE – Supreme Court procedure – judgments and orders –
↧
↧
Twining v Curtis
ANTHONY ALBERT TWINING v JACQUELINE ANNE CURTIS [2014] ACTCA 19 (17 June 2014) ON APPEAL FROM THE MASTER OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY - Judge: Refshauge J - Court of Appeal of the Australian Capital Territory - ACTCA 55 of 2013 - SC 178 of 2007
↧
Andara Homes Pty Limited v Mallitt and Mallitt
ANDARA HOMES PTY LIMITED v JUSTIN ROBERT MALLITT AND MICHELLE BERNICE MALLITT [2014] ACTSC 142 (18 June 2014) Judge: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SC 152 of 2014 - REAL PROPERTY – Caveats – Extension of caveat – Lapsing of caveat – Subsequent caveats -
↧
Andara Homes Pty Limited v Palm and Jiang
Andara Homes Pty Limited v Nicholas Palm And Ling Jiang [2014] ACTSC 141 (18 June 2014) Judge: Refshauge J - Supreme Court of the ACT - No. SC 148 of 2014 - REAL PROPERTY – Caveats – Extension of caveat – Lapsing of caveat – Subsequent caveats - PROCEDURE –
↧